Quick Takes 9

Hi all,

I thought it would be a good idea to make a note of a number of key blogs I track the on-going decline of our industrial civilisation.

An excellent resource is the SEE blog – run by Tim Morgan – see here, which is a consistently brillant reference. Tim has developed what seems to be a reasonably robust methodology to track how our economies will decline over the coming decades and it isn’t pretty.

Essentially, discretionary spending will contract (first in the developed world as per our on-going “cost of living crisis” since the early 2020s) and very soon, the still developing economies of India and China. Investment will also start to contract and will accelerate after 2030 which seems to be a turning point in terms of these metrics.

Obviously, central banks and governments won’t do nothing as these trends progress, but in reality they can’t do much more than print money, intervene in the markets and try and arrest the worst of the coming crisis. All this is inflationary and in some ways, counter-productive in the longer run. Tim also tries to scope out how this will play out in the financial realm and when the overinflated assets in equities, housing, crypto and so on, will pop.

To keep it really simple – and this aligns with my own reading which I’ve discussed extensively in this own blog -a turning point is coming around 2030, for multiple reasons, which is likely to trigger a Greater Depression in the 2030s. This will involve a massive crash in most assets, including likely gold as well, and a reset moment for our global monetary and economic trading system. Any Greater Depression is going to be a rough time indeed going forward and depending upon where you live, there is a real risk of civil unrest, wars and massive migration pressures as economies buckle, infrastructure degrades and governments flounder.

The second blog I follow closely is the Honest Sorcerer, which focuses heavily on energy, see here. Again, their writing concludes that we are on a type of plateau until around 2030 in terms of overall energy production, after which things deteriorate in terms of overall quantity and quality of energy production. This will trigger the end of economic growth as we know it, and a period of radical simplification of complexity, forced by the end of economic bubbles and the realities of energy depletion.

When you combine the insights of the above two blogs with John Greer’s comments and articles on peak oil and wider resource depletion over the years, you can get a reasonable idea on what is coming.

So, how am I doing with my adaption to these long-term trends? Well so far, my overall drive to simplify my lifestyle and “collapse first before the rush” is doing well. We rarely eat out these days, I don’t drive much anymore and largely use bus, bike and walking to get around. We buy in second-hand shops for discretionary items like clothes, children toys, books and so on which over time yields significant savings. We have also tried to cultivate a wider 1970s mindset of repair rather than replace and again, there is a developing eco-system which encourages people to fix items rather than throw them away.

I’ve discussed before that folks (outside the very wealthy) need to accept that lifestyles in the developed world are being forced back to the 1970s/1980s. That means cooking at home, growing some of your own produce, rarely eating out, not getting takeaways, not buying new when second hand or repairing an item is feasible, travelling less, and when you do within your own region rather than long-distance holidays to the other side of the world. Hand me downs for the kids, no fancy technology if it isn’t required and so on.

Frankly, a more frugal and sustainable lifestyle is ahead of us (and for those in denial and racking up the credit card debts, they need to get the memo soon given the growing risks of a serious financial crash).

Longer term, as we descend into the 2030s and 2040s, with a likely Greater Depression and potentially wars coming, our world will start to look closer to the earlier decades of the 20th century. Globalised supply chains will unravel, goods will become increasingly scarce and/or expensive and lifestyles will be forced to adapt to what I call a 1950s/1960s lifestyle. If you look at what a typical lifestyle in your area is from that era, you’ll get a sense of what it was like. I expect that to start emerging towards the end of the 2030s and certainly in the 2040s/2050s.

That could also mean some other ugly traits of that era. Where I come from in western Europe, the mid-century Europe was a dark place. A brutal war in the 1940s, which had followed a Depression in the 1930s and a tough economic period after the war with rationing lasting into the 1950s. I can’t say I’m looking forward to it and it could get very ugly indeed. Military wars, occupations, forced transfer of populations, rationing, migrations and horrendous violence.

Luckily, I don’t see such things happening anytime soon and these are longer term risks. Wealthy people from where I came from during that period generally left to sunnier, safer and fancier places to live in their mansions and hotels as it became obvious a war was coming in Europe. Cape Town, Bahamas and Barbados were popular places during the war and afterwards for such folk until things really started to get better in the 1950s.

And that’s a key lesson for you all. You don’t have to stay where you live. Wealthy Ukrainians live in Monaco, enjoying the good life whilst their fellow men are dying in the trenches of eastern Ukraine. I’m not justifying such behaviour but it is much more common than you realise from reading conventional history books. The very rich generally flee trouble and try and preserve their wealth far away from wars, revolutions and chaos.

Quick Takes 9

Quick Takes 8

Hello all!,

Apologies for the long time in posting, life has been crazy busy this year. Re-reading my last post on the new world dis-order, I would say overall it reads well but potentially I might be have not factored in the pace in which these changes take place.

The Europeans have played a reasonably good game trying to keep in President Trump’s good books (even calling him Daddy at the NATO summit!). Their commitments to a 5% spending on defence and defence related spending clearly worked in avoiding a short-term rupture of the alliance.

Ultimately, I still think the US is going to pull out over time but it might be a bit more extended time-frame. Much depends upon the evolution of the Ukraine war where the Russians are making slow but steady progress in the eastern front-line.

I’m wary of making any hard forecasts on this war but my best sense is the Ukrainians will struggle on until 2026 when the superiority of Russian power will finally overwhelm their frontlines, leading to collapses in critical front-lines across the front. Some type of resolution of the war will likely happen by 2026 although what exactly remains to be seen.

How the US adapts to that likely endgame is unclear, potentially the Americans may use the end of active fighting to accelerate their withdraw from NATO.

The Israeli-Iranian war was a fascinating war to watch, in part because it has such polarising perspectives. A friend of mine was adamant that Iran was winning the entire time, even after Israeli drones and airplanes were flying around Tehran knocking out prestigious regime targets day after day. I’ve seen before but it continues to amaze me how Israel seems to drive some people beyond the bend. It’s hard not to conclude that there is at least subconsciously an anti-Semitic strain to their mentality even if anti-Jewish racism remains, by and large, a taboo in Western society (although that is sadly starting to change).

I have my own theory that based on my cyclical view of history that when the last living survivor of a horrible period in history dies, the society will end of repeating the horrors not long afterwards. After the revolutionary wars following the French Revolution, it was a 100 years before everyone decided that a massive European war was something to look forward to (ergo WW1).* So on that basis, anti-Semitism returning makes sense over the next generation or so, as the remaining survivors of the Holocaust die off.

*You might ask, how about the European WW2. My view is very few people wanted WW2, other than deranged Nazis leaders. Most German folk, including their military didn’t want war and certainly not the Allied population. Without Hitler and the Nazi gang in power, WW2 was unlikely to have ever happened precisely because Europe was still traumatised by WW1.

Going back to the Israel-Iran it looks like Israel is the winner although at a high reputational cost given the on-going disaster of Gaza. Whether the Iranians can recover over the next few years will be interesting to watch.

Overall, my base case remains the same, we are in a decline era, a big economic and potentially geopolitical crisis is coming around 2030 and the next decade looks like a rather grim Greater Depression era for much of the world. And whilst the Russians do remain a credible military threat, particularly to the Baltics within a 10 year timeframe, the longer term threat to western Europe remains the rising power and influence of the Muslim Brotherhood and similar minded Islamist groups who are slowly but surely gaining control of the biggest cities of western Europe.

If you have any questions, please fire them over and I would be happy to answer them.

Quick Takes 8

A New World (dis)Order

Thing are moving even faster than I anticipated!

So, some kind of embryonic deal has already been agreed, it seems, between Russia and America given the speed of the planned summit to be held between President Putin and President Trump in Saudi Arabia (as soon as the end of the month).

The bigger macro picture is the Americans are getting out of the global empire business and shifting back to their North American continental core. I saw this tweet today on X saying the following “The U.S. will likely announce a massive withdrawal of American soldiers from Europe.” Christoph Heusgen, former German ambassador to the UN, head of the MSC. Said before the MSC but tells us a lot nonetheless.”

This is a game-changing moment of historical proportions. The US Defence Secretary Peter Hegsworth on 12th February declared that the US is no longer focused on European security; effectively declaring the end of NATO.

Folks, the long European break from history is over. Welcome back Europe.

This post captures the macro geopolitical shift the best, “At this juncture, the U.S. would “take its geopolitical football and go home,” retreating inward to fortify a continental empire, securing North America and extending influence deeper into Central America”.

The future of American power can be captured in this map.

Without American muscle, Europe is largely defenceless in its capacity to defend itself.

Even the United Kingdom, one of the more more robust militaries of Europe, is in a dire state as per this article.

“It is impossible to exaggerate the importance of this situation. As matters stand, most of the Royal Navy’s attack submarines are unable to undertake operations; the Royal Marines are reliant on one landing ship with inadequate command and control capabilities; and the Army’s principal combat formation, 3rd (UK) Division, would struggle to generate even a brigade-strength deployment. The new Ajax armoured fighting vehicle will not reach full operational capability until 2028, eight years behind schedule, with its wheeled Boxer counterpart reaching that milestone in 2032.”

Longer term, demographics and Europe’s near abroad suggest a dangerous security environment for much of Europe. A rising proportion of the population is Muslim and many of those younger Muslims are Islamist in their outlook, which poll and after poll shows. By mid-century, it is quite conceivable that our biggest cities in Europe will be majority Muslim for the under 30s. Sharia parties will be kingmakers in big cities, and possibly even national level politics.

At the same time, the long-term penetration of jihadi and Islamist ideologies by the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) grows, year by year, sponsored and supported by Turkey and Qatar. In fact, it seems that we are already seeing a stealth alliance between Turkey, Qatar, the MB and Al-Qaeda, a new Sunni radical axis, that seeks to overthrow Egypt, Jordan and eventually invade Europe. As John Greer recently wrote on his blog, it wouldn’t surprise him to see Turkish armies at the gates of Vienna at some point in the future this century.

War is returning to Europe and it isn’t just the revanchist Russians to worry about. If Islamist forces manage to gain control of Egypt’s formidable conventional military, combined with allied countries across the Arab world (and beyond) Europe will be at risk. This is unlikely to happen anytime soon, but at some in the decades to come, its a plausible scenario.

The world is seeing the Americans withdrawing, and ramifications will be huge in the Middle East and East Asia as much as Europe in the years to come. Everything is shifting.

Welcome to history folks. The holiday was fun but its now over.












A New World (dis)Order

2025 – a Review

Hi all,

Happy New Year! I hope you all had a good Christmas and New Year break with your loved ones.

Well, in the end, whilst I was a bit cautious in my blogging my gut call that Trump would win the election was proven correct with Trump winning 306 EC votes, something I was privately forecasting to key friends a few weeks before Election Day but didn’t quite have the conviction to forecast on this blog. Lesson learnt is to be a bit more confident in my predictions but the key takeaway is I predicted Trump would likely win and also likely win the popular vote (something very few were predicting prior to the election, including the betting markets).

From a macro perspective, I don’t see 2025 to be that different from previous years. We are on a bumpy plateau of energy production globally with things bumping along until the end of the decade, even though the energy required to generate the newer energies continues to rise.

Honest Sorcerer

“BeardTree, granted. The question is purely how long they can keep going before hard physical limits come into play. What’s happened so far is that increasingly energy-poor grades of liquid fuels have been brought into the mix, so that notional production stays high but the net energy (energy yield minus energy cost of production) drops steadily. As long as they can keep playing that game, we can expect slow erosion of lifestyles rather than sudden discontinuities (from that cause, at least).”

As John Greer notes above in his recent blog Q & A we don’t know long they can carry on this playing this game. Probably for a few years to come. One of the biggest sources of energy, US shale has probably peaked and is on its own plateau for the next few years before it starts to fall around 2028/2029. So, my best guess, is 2030 or around that year, when that game comes to an end and we get the “sudden discontinuities”.

honest sorcerer

Those are likely to include serious economic and political crises, including market crashes and a globalised banking crisis for the history books. If major economies have tipped or are tipping into economic contraction markets will at some stage price that into bond, equity and other asset markets. That will cause havoc for banks that lend credit and hold government and corporate bonds on their books (among many other assets).

My base case remains that this crisis will hit, certainly the United States, around 2029 but its possible it starts to impact other countries (hint, Germany and other stagnating European countries) earlier in the decade.

Either way, my personal message remains the same, Get out of debt, be sensible in spending, develop skills and alternative income streams, enjoy life and the opportunities that currently exist in our industrialised civilisation (like internet shopping, relatively cheap global travel etc).

From a geopolitical perspective, I expect at some point in 2025 some kind of deal between Ukraine, Russia and the West that ends the war. I’m sure both sides will declare victory but if the Russians carry on their military progress it will be a de facto win for the Russians.

Syria, despite the best hopes of some in the West, is likely to descend into anarchy and sectarian war as the new Islamist government shows its true colours.

Iran, having lost its external empire of proxies and terrorists in 2024, looks very vulnerable to an internal revolution. I don’t know if it will but I wouldn’t be shocked if some kind of crisis – maybe severe water shortages or the grid going down – triggers protests that lead to the overthrow of the Mullahs.

I don’t think we will see any clash in East Asia – at least in 2025 – over Taiwan. The election of President Trump provides the opportunity for a Grand Bargain between the United States and China. Whether a war or near-war happens later on this decade remains to be seen but Trump is less likely to trigger a war over Taiwan than any other US political leader.

Europe will continue to economically stagnate, hobbled by expensive energy, unsustainable welfare systems and a political-regulatory system that crushes the private sector. I don’t see any elections within Europe that really changes that dynamic for the foreseeable future. My sense is 2029/2030 is when the revolutionary tides comes for the failing European political class and we see populist and insurgents come to power in western Europe. A good case on why Europe will fall is made by this author here.

What happens in America, specifically whether Musk and his allies can really transform the US federal government into a leaner and more productive apparatus will be fascinating to watch. DOGE has the potential to transform the West’s politics and is already exerting pressure on a failing Europe to start de-regulating. It won’t happen of course, at least for a few years, but one can see the winds of change howling across the Atlantic.

Woke politics has peaked and is now on the decline. Once the higher education system – which is slowly going bankrupt anyway – starts to crumble the ideological centre of wokeness will go with it. That’s a good thing and will restore sanity to our politics.

A few analysts I follow are predicting that Artificial Intelligence (AI) will save us in the 2030s and beyond. Supposedly AI will help unleash a new era of cheap energy powered by fusion and SMR’s (small modular reactors), our economies will become vastly more productive and so on. I’m not saying that AI doesn’t have potential and won’t make major advances in certain areas (like biotech, financial services and defence) but I can’t help but feel sceptical on a number of grounds – the energy cost of the data centres – the issues around hallucinations and the usual hype cycle we see in AI going back to the 20th century. So for me, whilst the jury is out, I’m on the sceptical side that AI will, at best give us a few more years, maybe, but it doesn’t fundamentally change the LTG BAU model I’ve been tracking since the early 2000s.

So, on that cheerful note, have a good year!

2025 – a Review

US Presidential elections – update and forecast

Its nearly that time of the four year presidential cycle again! The polls are close, very close in some of the swing states and tensions are high as America gears up to choose their next president next week.

So where are we on the state of play? Early voting has overall been positive for Republicans, and in particular in Nevada where its looking increasingly likely that Trump will win that state. The so-called Sunbelt states in general are looking promising for the Republicans, including Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina.

Where things are looking far more difficult to predict is the so-called Rust Belt states; Wisconsin (WI), Michigan (MI) and Pennsylvania (PA). In the public polls, Trump has a narrow lead in PA but its effectively a tie in the other two states. I screen my polling to those pollsters who had the best success in 2020 and the overall map they are showing is the following:

As you can see, the overall picture seems to be a likely Trump win but PA is the key state. There are tentative signs that after sliding slowly over the last week or so, the Harris campaign has stabilised and could prevail in at least WI and MI.

One thing is for certain, WI and MI will be extremely close, with PA only a bit closer to the Trump side of things.

My own view is that either side can win this election but I would be surprised but not shocked if Harris pulls of a victory. However, my base case – with around 60% confidence – is Trump will win with 287 plus EC votes and quite possibly a win in the popular vote.

Historically the Rust Belt states vote together so history would suggest Trump should win all three states taking his EC lead to 312. It is simply too hard to say whether this happens this time or not though.

There is also the risk, certainly backed by the recent polling in places like New Hampshire or Virginia, that the Republicans might be able to flip one or more states, on a particularly good night, on top of the Rust Belt. We simply don’t know.

And on that note, enjoy election night!

US Presidential elections – update and forecast

Quick takes 7

Not a huge amount to update since my last quick takes session.

One blog I strongly recommend you bookmark is this one here, his writing is consistently excellent. His latest piece goes into detail on why 2030 is looking to be a car crash for the advanced world’s economy as overall energy production peaks and the cost to produce energy soars from 2030 onwards.

This very much aligns with my wider outlook of a Greater Depression commencing at some point in the 2nd half of this decade (although I think it will only become truly apparent to all around 2030). I have written plenty before on this blog on what to prepare for in anticipation of what is coming (something we have known since the 1970s and the Limits to Growth report came out).

To keep it simple, get out of debt, live a modest lifestyle, learn useful skills, diversify your income streams and build up supplies of non-perishable stuff that you find useful when globalised supply chains still function. Learn to grow some food, don’t rely too much of unsustainable systems and think about where you want to live long term.

As for the US elections, the overall impression is that since that debate performance, Trump has effectively wiped out the narrow but real lead in the Electoral College vote and the election is basically a pure tie right now. I’m starting to see the signs though that memories of the debate is starting to fade a bit and the fundamentals are starting to re-assert themselves again. So, just maybe, Trump is starting to inch out ahead of Harris again in a few key states.

My overall impression is Trump is ahead in Georgia, North Carolina and Pennsylvania and therefore would narrowly win the election if it was held today. However, this is a very tight race and overall I would call it a tie right now. The next few weeks are critical but Trump seems to have avoided any stupid gaffes since his poor debate performance and that seems to be helping him to edge up again.

There is growing chatter about a potential Chinese invasion/attack on Taiwan around 2027 and the risks of a world war and a economic crisis. We will see. I’m not wholly convinced but its certainly a real possibility. I would like to think that despite all the sabre rattling we can dodge a major war this decade even if we get hot wars in the margins like in the Middle East right now.

As for that other war in eastern Europe, Russia is making incremental progress in taking the whole of the Donbass as the Ukrainian army falls apart. Nothing has changed in my base case that 2024 will see the Donbas fall to Russia, 2025 larger part of Ukraine including possibly Kiev and Odessa and, should the war still be on, 2026 the bulk of the remaining country collapsing.

Most likely, at some point in 2025, there will be a ceasefire and a deal between the Russians and whoever replaces Zelensky. What happens after that is a fascinating question. Most likely, a strange period where the new realities everyone adjusts to as Europe wakes up to the fact Russia is the dominant military power. Will the Americans hang around or leave Europe to its fate? That’s a hard call and depends on who wins the elections.

That’s it for this time. Enjoy the peace!

Quick takes 7

Quick Takes 6

Hi all,

Apologies for the long delay in posting, its been very busy the last few months.

Here are a few of my thoughts in terms of what has happened recently:

US elections: the forced removal of President Biden as the Democratic candidate after his disastrous debate performance and replacement with Vice President Harris has transformed the race. Harris has now caught up with Trump in the critical swing states and the respected Nate Silver pollster has called it a tied race now.

Based on fundamentals, e.g. the top two issues that voters care about, the economy and immigration, Trump should still narrowly win this election. However, Harris has clearly energised parts of the Democratic base, in particular Blacks, young voters and women.

If you put a gun to my head, I would say either candidate can win but Trump should edge in the electoral college in November, after the honeymoon phase ends for Harris in the coming months. Do I have a strong conviction about this? No, so there you go.

US economy: markets are now getting concerned about prospects for economic growth in the US. My take is earnings reports all show that US consumers are cutting back on discretionary spending e.g. nice to haves and that is a trend that will continue in the years and decades ahead. This is a global trend which is why anyone invested or involved in businesses that gear to nice to haves versus necessities should reconsider their jobs/careers.

At a global level, my best estimate is nominal growth will die in 2026/27 and the world will tip into economic contraction (in nominal not just in real terms) in the late 2020s, triggering a massive collapse in global assets at the end of this decade.

Europe: Russia continues to make incremental gains in the east of the country and I see no reason to change my outlook that Russia will fully gain the Donbas this year, will make further gains into Kiev and Odessa in 2025 and a collapse of Ukraine will happen in 2026 unless a peace deal emerges next year.

Either way, a Russian victory in this war will transform the post-Soviet security architecture in Europe and galvanise those wanting to end the American dominance of the world. So, either way, I expect the half of the 2020s to be a dangerous time geopolitically not just in Europe but in East Asia, Middle East and the Caucasus.

So, my longer term outlook remains the same for Europe, wars are coming (concentrated in the Balkans and eastern Europe but likely to spread over time) and, in a generations time, once demographic trends continue, rising tensions between the Muslim minority (who will be majorities in a few European cities by the 2040s – e.g. Birmingham etc) and the non-Muslim populations.

What will make this growing cleavage particularly dangerous is the fact that climate change is making much of north Africa and the Middle East increasingly hard to live in for large scale populations. Its a matter of time, probably within a decade or so, before populations in those regions conclude they have to move to more hospitable climates and Europe is the obvious choice.

Based on my reading of the data, the 2040s and 2050s look like the period when large scale invasions from Africa and the Middle East will start in earnest, around the time that demographic trends lead to a large plurality, and in some cities, majorities, of young men being Muslim. You don’t need to be a historian to work out what happens next, civil wars and external invasions that transform much of Europe into an Islamic empire.

Or as Greer recently said, “As for barbarian invasions, nah, this is just the warmup exercises for that. I recommend reading a good account of the barbarian invasion of Gaul in 406-407 if you want a sense of what’s on its way: that is to say, not a modest flow of refugees, but massed armies and the overthrow of governments. You’ll know the next round is well under way when the last president of France is hiding out in Canada and the Islamic Republic of al-Faransa has just been proclaimed in Paris.”

On that positive note enjoy the weekend!

Quick Takes 6

A global tour

Adobe

Apologies for the delay in posting, been a bit busy the last few months!

So, what has fundamentally changed since my last series of posts early this year and late last year? Well, for one thing it looks highly likely we are facing a re-run of the Biden versus Trump contest in November 2024 (assuming neither candidate is incapacitated or dies between now and then).

If one looks at the swing state polling, there is a clear and consistent trend that Trump is narrowly ahead in the majority of the states and this has been the case for months now. There is a plausible path for President Biden to win, through Michigan, Minnesota and Pennsylvania (which assumes he loses the rest of the swing states like Arizona, Georgia, Nevada etc).

Here is the map for the US electoral college geeks among you.

My own personal view remains, albeit with a low conviction ratio, that Trump is more likely than not to win this election but very narrowly. I wouldn’t be shocked or surprised if the above turns out to be the result on election day though.

Biden’s best pathway is through the mainly white Rust Belt states in the northeast given his declining numbers among non-white minorities that are trending towards the Republicans.

At a bigger scale, all the metrics do seem to suggest we are tracking the LTG BAU modelling on a macro scale. I discovered a very interesting article recently called Peak Everything which attempts to track what is likely to be an economic depression coming.

Here is one of their graphs, one I find most interesting:

It tries to capture the trajectory of the global economy as we face declining energy inputs and rising energy requirements to maintain energy supplies going forward.

What is clearly obvious is that 1) more and more economic activity will be essentials in nature and investment and discretionaries (e.g. nice to haves) will shrink from around now into 2040 and 2) at sometime around the mid 2020s, again around now, global prosperity will shift into contraction rather than growth (it appears to become clear around 2026/27 when we tip into economic contraction), until then we are basically stagnating (with certain bits of the globe still growing for a few more years).

This also aligns with various sources I track in terms of the S&P 500 that suggest we are looking at a peak in the US equity index around 2026 at 6k or above. Whether it crashes after that, corrects and goes sideways until the late 2020s remains to be seen. Certainly looking at those charts its hard not to conclude a major financial and equities crash is looming, certainly past 2028 or so.

My personal strategy is to take profits over 2025/2026 in my equities, hold cash and be patient and wait for the inevitable crash in the markets to buy high quality dividend earning companies geared to the “essentials” economy. I’m thinking mining, energy, fertiliser, agricultural and consumer durables. After all, we will still consume energy, use copper, eat and produce food and require tractors, toothpaste and baby wipers in 20 years (even if we can’t afford fancy smartphones, new cars, foreign holidays, new clothes, expensive aftershave and the latest tech gadgets etc).

That is what the blog, which I do recommend reading in full, here, covers in depth.

Population trends, specifically the looming peak in global population is also beautifully captured by one of John Greer’s recent essays, here. To cut a long story short, with a contracting population you will see a contracting economy. There will be little point investing (outside niche areas), businesses will struggle to make a profit and anyone who owns assets should expect the mean to go lower as less and less people are around to use or consume anything.

Peter Zeihan has also discussed the dire implications of this for our current system in depth as well. The long and short of it is welfare systems, and pension systems in particular, are unlikely to survive these shocks. What is likely to happen is a political crisis, triggered by a fiscal/debt crisis triggered in term by the end of growth and various attempts to try and stabilise the system. This will be a mix of rampant money printing, cutting of benefits to working age people and in the worst case scenario a collapse of governments.

The key point to remember is to rely less on governments and corporations going forward. DIY is the future as Greer writes well in his latest post online. One example of rising costs is insurance, something Ian Welsh has commented on his recent post here, as availability is already starting to shrink for those places most exposed to fires and hurricanes.

“As government fails, we will be pushed back on what we can do for ourselves, and for that to work we’ll have to be realistic: “what can our group actually do?” Can we source medicines? Can we rebuild?“. This is our future, we will have to become more self-reliant, whether we like it or not.

So my macro outlook remains the same, these forces are building up like a earthquake, the signals are already flashing red, and are likely to explode in the late 2020s/early 2030s in a systemic political, financial and energetic crisis.

I haven’t discussed this before, but I have maintained a private “model” of where the Ukraine war is heading for a while now. We are tracking a WW2 model, with 2022 being Russia’s 1941 (a disaster), 2023 being 1942 (not good but Stalingrad proving a turning point), with 2024 being 1943 when Russia made major progress in winning the war and gaining territory, and 2025/26 being the collapse of Ukraine and surrender.

The loss of Bakhmut to the Russians in 2023 is equivalent to Stalingrad and the more recent loss of the fortress of Avdiivek could potentially be similar to the Battle of Kiev in 1943, after which the Germans lost their strategic offensive capacity. What this suggests is a collapse of the Ukrainian lines at some point between this year and 2026, or at least starting this Summer when the Russians are likely to launch their massive offensive.

The defeat of Ukraine would not just be a disaster for Ukrainians but also a humiliation for NATO and the Western powers. It will cause huge tensions within the EU and likely accelerate the withdrawal of the Americans back to their continental heartland.

To summarise, we are still in the early stages of a collapse of the current globalised geopolitical and economic order and whatever replaces it will be regional and local in nature as globalised supply chains unravel in the coming decades.

Our world will become smaller, more frugal and closer to what our parents and grandparents lived. Its not the end of the world but the expectations gap between the future we were promised and what we are likely to get is huge, particularly in the developed world.

Best to buy the popcorn and enjoy the ride folks.

A global tour

Quick Takes 5

The global macro landscape continues to evolve in fascinating ways. Here are the best links I came across recently that you might find interesting:

2024 – A perfect global storm

With the crisis in the South China Sea now more or less permanent, the lack of mission-capable ships is the main reason why last December the Navy dedicated a remarkably small strike group to Operation Prosperity Guardian in the Red Sea, consisting of one aircraft carrier and three escorting destroyers. The British provided one destroyer, while Denmark and Greece promised a frigate each. The Netherlands, Norway, and Australia are together sending two-dozen military personnel in all, but no vessels. Singapore’s navy is providing a center “to support information sharing and engagement outreach to the commercial shipping community.”

This amounts to an utter debacle, effectively the U.S. has zero contribution from all but Britain. Australia’s refusal to send ships is a particularly unpleasant shock to the administration. Some nominal members of the operation have even refused to announce their participation in public for fear of being linked to Israel and suffering military or terrorist reprisals.

U.S. military bases in the region—notably in Bahrain, right across the Gulf from Iran—appear potentially more vulnerable than ever before.

Coupled with the looming defeat of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, likely followed by a major Russian offensive come summer, the global mix is becoming volatile in the extreme.”

The Sun Sets Slowly – then quickly

“America is a naval empire. It, like the old British empire, rests on being able to keep the shipping lines open and on using naval power (and air power) to hurt nations while those nations can’t fight back. In the 19th century the Brits would park ironclads off the coast and just pound cities, and there was nothing those cities could do in return.

This is, then, one of the key moments in the end of Western hegemony. The point at which we no longer have deterrence; at which we can no longer “big foot” other nations.

The end of Western dominance is close, very close. I can taste it, like a hint of salt on a sea breeze. The Chinese are only behind in a few technological areas. Once other nations can get everything they need from China/Russia and other lesser nations they will be free to throw off the Western order, because the new and improved missiles make “stand off and bomb” far less effective than it used to be.”

NATO warns of all-out war with Russia within 20 years

“Civilians must prepare for all-out war with Russia in the next 20 years, a top Nato military official has warned.

While armed forces are primed for the outbreak of war, private citizens need to be ready for a conflict that would require wholesale change in their lives, Adml Rob Bauer said on Thursday.”

Growing talk about bringing back national service and a return to a war economy across Europe now. The war drums are starting to beat louder and louder.

UK defence minister warns of regional wars in 5 years

UK minister warns the world is in a pre-war era and should prepare for wars against Iran, Russia and China in 5 years (e.g. 2029).

Obviously, the risks of regional wars across the world will shatter the global economy and the globalised supply chains.

All this seems painfully like the updated LTG BAU model doesn’t it? And note it all unravels from the mid-2020s onwards, around the time US shale is supposed to peak and rollover…

Quick Takes 5

US elections 2024

NBC news

So, we have the US presidential elections coming in November 2024. Now, I’m a US politics geek but even I am struggling to get even remotely excited or even interested by the prospect of these two elderly men fighting it out, again for the role of Commander in Chief.

And I’m not even American.

Polls show that around 6 in 10 Americans do not want a Trump versus Biden repeat.

The third party alternative, No Labels, have published a great memo called “House of Cards” which outline just how unpopular both sides are to so many of the American people. It is worth reading in full which you can do here.

No Labels

As you can see, there is a theoretical path for a third party party to come through this election. And there is signs of a growing backlash against the two legacy parties, note how the most recent meta polling shows a surge in interest in “Others”.

Reviewing the mainstream media, the overwhelming consensus is that most voters will end up voting for whatever is their “lesser evil” candidate, whether Trump or Biden – assuming that Trump wins the primaries which looks very likely – and given how tight the race is, it could go either way.

This post isn’t a forecast – because I simply don’t have a high conviction on this – but I do have a nagging wonder, what if, a third party can build momentum in 2024, and start attracting polling numbers above 15% or so.

In that scenario, with the two lead candidates both sinking in the polls and say No Labels enjoying a huge surge in the polls after their April Convention, maybe we could see a third party force seriously threaten both the Democrats and Republicans in November?

I don’t know. But it is something I will be monitoring closely this year. As my American cousin said to me the other day, “That about sums it up for me. There’s got to be SOMEBODY better than the current 2 bad choices.”

What do you all think? Would love to hear the feedback.

p.s. I don’t recommend political betting (and in some places like America it is illegal) but where I live there are no restrictions. I placed a 400 to 1 bet Joe Manchin will become the next president. Yep, wild and highly unlikely, but, he is a plausible candidate for No Labels and the underlying polling does suggest there is an opportunity for a centrist third party candidate who appeals to both sides, to come through (thanks to AI can already visualise the future! :)).

We’ll see.

US elections 2024